I mean. She is one of the richest person in her country, got a PhD in economics. If you are as powerful, as beautiful, as smart and as rich as her; you can point a middle finger anywhere. Read more about Yulia Tymoshenko. So now that she is no longer a prime minister, I thought about possible successors who can claim the hottest head of state title. I kept my finger crossed that it will be Queen Raina of Jordan and googled and. I then found this website - Hottest Heads of State. Huh. Interesting. Someone actually complied and updated the list. Tymoshenko is now listed as the former #1. The current reigning queen? I have no idea who Michaelle Jean (Governor General of Canada) until today. And guess who made it to #16. Our very own Prime Minister Lee who came in right after US President Barack Obama. To my disappointment, Queen Raina did not make it to the list. Perhaps the list is exclusively Head of State. But I will post a photo anyway.
28.2.10
Yulia Tymoshenko
I mean. She is one of the richest person in her country, got a PhD in economics. If you are as powerful, as beautiful, as smart and as rich as her; you can point a middle finger anywhere. Read more about Yulia Tymoshenko. So now that she is no longer a prime minister, I thought about possible successors who can claim the hottest head of state title. I kept my finger crossed that it will be Queen Raina of Jordan and googled and. I then found this website - Hottest Heads of State. Huh. Interesting. Someone actually complied and updated the list. Tymoshenko is now listed as the former #1. The current reigning queen? I have no idea who Michaelle Jean (Governor General of Canada) until today. And guess who made it to #16. Our very own Prime Minister Lee who came in right after US President Barack Obama. To my disappointment, Queen Raina did not make it to the list. Perhaps the list is exclusively Head of State. But I will post a photo anyway.
24.2.10
quote
pie? or pi?
feeling grumpy?
In a bad mood? Don't worry - according to research, it's good for you.
An Australian psychology expert who has been studying emotions has found being grumpy makes us think more clearly. In contrast to those annoying happy types, miserable people are better at decision-making and less gullible, his experiments showed. While cheerfulness fosters creativity, gloominess breeds attentiveness and careful thinking, Professor Joe Forgas told Australian Science Magazine.
'Eeyore days'
The University of New South Wales researcher says a grumpy person can cope with more demanding situations than a happy one because of the way the brain "promotes information processing strategies".
He asked volunteers to watch different films and dwell on positive or negative events in their life, designed to put them in either a good or bad mood. Next he asked them to take part in a series of tasks, including judging the truth of urban myths and providing eyewitness accounts of events. Those in a bad mood outperformed those who were jolly - they made fewer mistakes and were better communicators. Professor Forgas said: "Whereas positive mood seems to promote creativity, flexibility, co-operation and reliance on mental shortcuts, negative moods trigger more attentive, careful thinking, paying greater attention to the external world."
The study also found that sad people were better at stating their case through written arguments, which Forgas said showed that a "mildly negative mood may actually promote a more concrete, accommodative and ultimately more successful communication style". His earlier work shows the weather has a similar impact on us - wet, dreary days sharpened memory, while bright sunny spells make people forgetful.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/8339647.stm
Published: 2009/11/05 17:15:23 GMT © BBC MMX
*growl* grr
pathetic fallacy
do you talk to your pillow? or your soft toys? pathetic.
22.2.10
21.2.10
loss of appetite
budding symptoms of a workaholic.
19.2.10
friday night question
pls don't answer me.
thy sons are we
How have you fare?
13.2.10
stand by area
Wish you all a happy lunar new year.
7.2.10
GTA
"Yes?"
"Can I have some papers to print on?"
"Sure."
I heaved a sigh of relief. I had enough unclever questions for an afternoon already. Thankfully, I do not have to answer one more. But guiding the students in the lab session was only the easy part. At the end of the lab session, I hauled the pile of reports back to my desk. I prepared myself for the worst and flipped open the pandora box of scratchy illegible handwrittings, words written over smudged liquid paper ink and scribblings all over the answer sheets. A guy even punctuated his statements not with a period, but with a smiley face. I looked at his name and tried to recall if he's cute. That certain memory drew a blank.. oh well. After marking a few scripts, a smile break across my face. The easiest script to mark is a blank script.
教師謝?はい女の子?
new year dinners
Can we do new year gatherings at KFC instead? where there's no fishballs?
PB
PB.
Certificate
6.2.10
1.2.10
awakening
Do you remember the post where I cited a BBC News article. Right at that moment, I was thinking," 83% happy? Damn these scientist must be really bored." What a ridicule. What a waste of research funding. Now, I as I program this learning machine, I am eating my own words. I can totally see myself doing the same thing 10years down the road, if I were to pursue a phd. hah.
Maybe I am becoming one of them. g-e-e-k.